EB-2 NIW I-140 4,167 cases analyzed

How to Respond to an EB-2 NIW RFE

The three Dhanasar prongs officers challenge most, and the evidence that actually moves a National Interest Waiver forward.

Cases analyzed
4,167
AAO appeal decisions
Sustained
2%
appeal fully successful
Remanded
7%
error found, sent back
Dismissed
90%
appeal not successful
What triggers this RFE
  • Prong 1: the officer conflates “substantial merit” (value in the field) with “national importance” (impact beyond the petitioner's institution) — these are two distinct tests.
  • Prong 2: evidence reads as a general credentials list rather than proof the petitioner specifically can advance this endeavor.
  • Prong 3: the balance-of-benefits argument is boilerplate, not tied to this petitioner's specific facts.
  • The proposed endeavor itself is described too broadly to evaluate (“advancing my field” instead of a concrete, bounded plan).
How to structure your response
  • Ground Prong 1 in concrete, national-scope evidence — policy adoption, national media coverage, federal funding, or commercialization data reaching beyond one institution.
  • For Prong 2, show a track record in this specific endeavor: prior outputs, unique access to data or infrastructure, or awards tied directly to the proposed work.
  • For Prong 3, explain why waiving the labor certification specifically benefits the U.S. now — not why immigrants in general are beneficial.
  • Narrow and define the proposed endeavor in one or two sentences the officer can actually evaluate against all three prongs.
Evidence that actually persuaded the AAO

Dismissed · 2023 Supplemental letter from former Brazilian employer documenting progression from basic duties (modeling, integration, process controls) to more advanced responsibilities (efficiency analyses, change management projects, employee training support), establishing over five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience.

Remanded · 2019 Updated Certificates of Career from two employers listing specific job duties in biomedical materials engineering and alloy development, including percentage of time devoted to each responsibility, sufficient to establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience equivalent to a master's degree.

Dismissed · 2023 Petitioner's foreign engineering degree from a Brazilian university with academic transcripts and employer letters, establishing she holds the equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree in civil engineering plus five years of progressive experience (satisfying the advanced degree professional requirement)

Dismissed · 2024 Letters and articles documenting petitioner's achievements as an amateur and collegiate golfer, including Conference USA All-Academic honors, C-USA Golfer of the Week, C-USA Most Improved Golfer, Academic All-American (five times), and tournament wins at the junior, collegiate, and amateur level

Remanded · 2021 Petitioner's personal statement describing a proposed endeavor involving flight simulator maintenance and teaching/training new technicians in independent training centers, aviation maintenance schools, and colleges was found sufficient to identify a 'specific undertaking' under Dhanasar.

Evidence that wasn't enough alone

Remanded · 2021 USA Evaluations credential evaluation concluding petitioner held U.S. MBA equivalent — rejected because the evaluator did not review employment letters to verify work experience and relied solely on petitioner's resume for professional experience, and there was an unexplained discrepancy between the diploma (which listed 'administration') and the evaluator's characterization (bachelor's in business administration with a major in management).

Dismissed · 2023 Expert opinion letter from a Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering professor, which was found insufficient for the achievements and significant contributions criterion because it lacked specific information about the petitioner's achievements, how her contributions rose to a significant level, and recognition by peers or professional organizations

Remanded · 2023 Academic credential evaluation opining that petitioner's Colombian occupational certificate, technician degree, and 12 years of experience equate to a U.S. Bachelor of Science in Aviation Maintenance Technology — rejected because regulations require a single foreign equivalent bachelor's degree, not a combination of lesser credentials and experience

Dismissed · 2024 Citation record of 92 citations including top-20% percentile claims: Clarivate Analytics data compared electrical engineering to the broader engineering field without sufficient evidence the data applies equally to each subfield; also citation frequency is quantitative and does not reveal qualitative reasons for citations

Dismissed · 2023 Employer letters did not establish ten years of full-time experience as a dentist prior to the October 2020 filing date; petitioner's actual pre-filing dentistry experience was approximately six months as a general dentist, thirteen months as a dental assistant, and four months part-time as a dental hygienist

Officer errors that got real cases remanded
Officer error the AAO identified2023

The Director erroneously found the petitioner eligible for the underlying EB-2 classification; the AAO withdrew that finding because the petitioner's occupation as exercise trainer/group fitness instructor does not require a U.S. bachelor's degree for entry, and her combined Brazilian credentials (license certificate plus graduate certificate) do not constitute a single foreign equivalent of a U.S. bachelor's degree.

Officer error the AAO identified2021

The Director analyzed whether the petitioner had five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, but failed to apply the correct regulatory standard: for specialties where a doctoral degree is customarily required (such as dentistry/oral surgery), a combination of education and experience cannot substitute — the petitioner must hold a foreign equivalent doctoral degree.

Officer error the AAO identified2025

The Director incorrectly found the petitioner met the underlying EB-2 visa classification requirements as an advanced degree professional; the AAO withdrew this finding because the experience letters lacked the specific duty descriptions required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) and did not establish five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.

Officer error the AAO identified2025

Director incorrectly found the membership in professional associations criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E)) was met; AAO reversed this finding because the Petitioner's Professional Identity Card was issued by a body not covered by the cited Decree, and the Telecommunications Technician designation was not shown to require a U.S. bachelor's degree equivalent.

Officer error the AAO identified2024

Director incorrectly found the petitioner met the membership in professional associations criterion (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E)) — the golf organizations at issue (unnamed association and Florida State Golf Association) do not require a baccalaureate degree for membership and therefore do not qualify as 'professional associations' under the EB-2 regulations.

Recent EB-2 NIW cases
Dismissed2024 · MAY302024_02B5203

A financial manager's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was dismissed because the proposed sma…

A financial manager's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was dismissed because the proposed small-business advisory

Dismissed2023 · OCT022023_03B5203

A special education teacher's national interest waiver petition was dismissed because her proposed …

A special education teacher's national interest waiver petition was dismissed because her proposed work was found to ben

Remanded2023 · OCT132023_04B5203

A waiter's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was remanded because the Director's denial improp…

A waiter's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was remanded because the Director's denial improperly relied on eviden

Dismissed2024 · MAY212024_05B5203

A Brazilian HR management specialist's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was dismissed because…

A Brazilian HR management specialist's EB-2 National Interest Waiver petition was dismissed because she could only prove

Dismissed2025 · JAN072025_02B5203

An elementary school special needs educator's third motion to reconsider her denied EB-2 National I…

An elementary school special needs educator's third motion to reconsider her denied EB-2 National Interest Waiver petiti

Dismissed2024 · MAY162024_07B5203

An entrepreneur in multimedia production sought a national interest waiver to establish a U.S.

An entrepreneur in multimedia production sought a national interest waiver to establish a U.S. business, but the AAO dis

See all 4,167 EB-2 NIW cases →