This appeal was not successful at this stage
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner filed for O-1A classification (sciences, education, business, or athletics), but mixology falls within the arts, making the beneficiary ineligible for O-1A. The petitioner's mid-case attempt to switch to O-1B was not accepted.
3 more criteria would trigger a full merits review.
A restaurant and bar filed an I-129 petition seeking O-1A classification for a beneficiary working as a mixologist. When USCIS questioned the evidence, the petitioner attempted mid-case to switch to O-1B (arts) classification, arguing that mixology is a creative art form. The AAO agreed that mixology falls within the arts and thus under O-1B, but held that USCIS only adjudicates the classification originally designated on the petition at filing. Because the petitioner selected O-1A and mixology does not qualify under O-1A's covered fields, the petition was fundamentally deficient and the appeal was dismissed without reaching the merits of the evidentiary criteria.
What failed: The petitioner selected O-1A at filing even though mixology belongs in the arts (O-1B). Attempting to switch classifications mid-case after an RFE was not permitted under USCIS rules. The record also failed to clearly connect the beneficiary's business ownership to acclaim as a mixologist.
Takeaway: Petitioners must correctly identify the O-1 sub-classification (O-1A vs. O-1B) at initial filing, as USCIS will not consider an alternate classification raised later. Mixologists should file under O-1B (arts) from the outset, supported by evidence tailored to the arts criteria.
Cases like this are frequently used by attorneys when responding to RFEs or building initial petitions. The evidence patterns that worked (or failed) here directly reflect what USCIS officers look for when evaluating O-1A criteria.
● Evidence that moved the needle
- See summary above for details.
● Evidence that wasn't enough alone
- The petitioner selected O-1A at filing even though mixology belongs in the arts (O-1B)
- Attempting to switch classifications mid-case after an RFE was not permitted under USCIS rules
- The record also failed to clearly connect the beneficiary's business ownership to acclaim as a mixologist.
Petitioner's mid-case attempt to reclassify the petition from O-1A to O-1B was rejected because USCIS only considers the visa classification annotated on the petition at initial filing
Evidence and arguments regarding O-1B criteria under 8 C.F.R. § 214.2(o)(3)(iv)(B)(1)-(6) were not considered because O-1B was not the filed classification
Evidence of business ownership was found insufficient by SCOPS to establish sustained acclaim as a mixologist under O-1A
SCOPS adjudicated the petition under O-1A despite the field of mixology properly belonging to O-1B (arts), though the AAO reserved this as an alternate basis and did not find it reversible error given the petitioner's own O-1A filing designation.
Completed
I-129 filed
Mixologist (cocktail/beverage specialist)
Completed
SCOPS — Denied
Initial decision: Denied.
Completed
Appeal to the AAO
Petitioner appealed to the Administrative Appeals Office for de novo review.
2025-05-22
AAO decision — Dismissed
The appeal was dismissed because the petitioner filed for O-1A classification (sciences, education, business, or athletics), but mixology falls within the arts, making the beneficiary ineligible for O-1A. The petitioner's mid-case attempt to switch to O-1B was not accepted.
If you're appealing a similar decision, I-290B must be filed within 30 days of personal service of the denial, or 33 days if mailed.
Find this useful? A coffee helps keep Case Reviewer free and ad-free.
Buy me a coffee