Good news — this case cleared the first bar
The AAO withdrew SCOPS's denial and remanded the case because the petitioner demonstrated at least three evidentiary criteria were met (including high salary), triggering the required totality-of-the-record analysis for extraordinary ability in the arts.
Next step: a full merits review weighing all the evidence together.
A tattoo studio petitioned for O-1B classification for a Venezuelan-born tattoo artist based in Argentina. SCOPS denied the petition, finding fewer than three evidentiary criteria met. On appeal, the AAO agreed with SCOPS on several criteria—finding that tattoo magazine contest awards were not comparable to top-tier industry prizes, that self-compiled photo documents failed to satisfy the lead/starring participant criterion, and that self-authored interview statements did not establish major commercial or critical acclaim. However, the AAO found SCOPS made a legal error in analyzing the high-salary criterion by converting the beneficiary's Argentine peso income to U.S. dollars rather than comparing it to Argentine wage benchmarks. When correctly compared, the beneficiary earned approximately 40 times the highest average annual salary for tattoo artists in Argentina, satisfying the high-salary criterion. Because the petitioner had now demonstrated at least three criteria, the AAO remanded for a totality-of-the-record extraordinary ability analysis.
What worked: The high-salary criterion was ultimately met because the beneficiary's Argentine peso earnings were approximately 40 times the top average tattoo artist salary in Argentina—a comparison the AAO required SCOPS to make correctly using local wage data rather than converting to U.S. dollars.
What failed: Contest awards from a tattoo magazine were not shown to carry prestige comparable to an Academy Award or Grammy. Self-compiled photo albums did not satisfy the evidentiary types required for the lead/starring participant or commercial success criteria. Self-authored interview quotes and social media posts did not qualify as major commercial acclaim or third-party critical recognition.
Takeaway: When a beneficiary earns income abroad, always present salary comparisons using local wage statistics for the relevant country—never rely solely on a U.S.-dollar conversion. For the lead/starring and commercial success criteria, submit third-party critical reviews, formal advertisements, or published trade coverage rather than self-compiled photo collections or social media posts.
Cases like this are frequently used by attorneys when responding to RFEs or building initial petitions. The evidence patterns that worked (or failed) here directly reflect what USCIS officers look for when evaluating O-1B criteria.
● Evidence that moved the needle
- The high-salary criterion was ultimately met because the beneficiary's Argentine peso earnings were approximately 40 times the top average tattoo artist salary in Argentina—a comparison the AAO required SCOPS to make correctly using local wage data rather than converting to U.S
● Evidence that wasn't enough alone
- Contest awards from a tattoo magazine were not shown to carry prestige comparable to an Academy Award or Grammy
- Self-compiled photo albums did not satisfy the evidentiary types required for the lead/starring participant or commercial success criteria
- Self-authored interview quotes and social media posts did not qualify as major commercial acclaim or third-party critical recognition.
Income Certification with monthly invoices showing the Beneficiary earned approximately 40 times the highest average annual salary for tattoo artists in Argentina (around 13,098,692 ARS vs. a 325,800 ARS benchmark), establishing the high salary criterion.
Two previously credited criteria accepted by SCOPS (specific criteria not detailed in the decision text)
Magazine contest awards from a tattoo publication (2022 and 2024) were not shown to be comparable in significance to an Academy Award, Emmy, Grammy, or Director's Guild Award.
Self-composed documents of photographs of artwork and awards were insufficient to satisfy the lead/starring participant criterion, which requires critical reviews, advertisements, publicity releases, publication contracts, or endorsements.
Promotional flyer for tattoo festival and social media posts were not properly translated and did not establish a leading or starring role.
Self-authored magazine interview responses and biography excerpts did not constitute major commercial or critically acclaimed successes as required by the publications criterion.
Sponsorship contracts and social media postings by sponsor brands did not qualify as evidence in trade journals, major newspapers, or other publications for the commercial success criterion.
Seminar program materials and attendee payment records did not qualify as critical reviews, advertisements, publicity releases, publication contracts, or endorsements.
Testimonial letter from a fellow award recipient did not sufficiently establish the significance of the awards or distinguish the beneficiary's specific awards from others at the contest.
SCOPS improperly converted the Beneficiary's Argentine salary to U.S. dollars to assess high salary, rather than comparing it to wage statistics in the applicable work location (Argentina).
Completed
I-129 filed
Tattoo artist specializing in realism, color, and black-and-gray styles
Completed
SCOPS — Denied
Initial decision: Denied.
Completed
Appeal to the AAO
Petitioner appealed to the Administrative Appeals Office for de novo review.
2025-05-14
AAO decision — Remanded
The AAO withdrew SCOPS's denial and remanded the case because the petitioner demonstrated at least three evidentiary criteria were met (including high salary), triggering the required totality-of-the-record analysis for extraordinary ability in the arts.
If you're appealing a similar decision, I-290B must be filed within 30 days of personal service of the denial, or 33 days if mailed.
Find this useful? A coffee helps keep Case Reviewer free and ad-free.
Buy me a coffee